 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cecchi v. Zwilling, CV 970403640,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, November 22, 1999, Decided , November 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a hearing for damages, plaintiff landlords were to keep the security deposit and defendant tenants were ordered to pay the balance of the costs for cleaning the subject property.
|
|||||
| Conaway v. 84 Forest, CVH 6091, H - 1180,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, HOUSING SESSION, November 22, 1999, Decided , November 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In lawsuit by former tenant, tenant's original possession of the premises was rightful and the only proper mode of eviction available to the landlord was that of summary process; tenant had not abandoned the premises.
|
|||||
| Conaway v. 84 Forest, L.L.C., CVH 6091,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, HOUSING SESSION, November 22, 1999, Decided , November 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Landlord was held vicariously liable for misguided efforts of its employee to lease and then terminate lease of plaintiff; landlord was not liable for punitive or double damages for intentional acts.
|
|||||
| Gould v. Gould, FA 980059091S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, November 22, 1999, Decided , November 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parties' marriage was dissolved on the ground of irretrievable breakdown, division of property and debts was made.
|
|||||
| Greenberg v. Haddam Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV 990087811S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, November 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant zoning board of appeals decision denying variance to renovate garage into residence was proper where there was no legally cognizable hardship and no partiality or predisposition of board member proven.
|
|||||
| Martin v. Martin, FA 9876240,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, November 22, 1999, Decided , November 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dissolution of marriage action, the court dissolved the marriage and awarded wife a fixed property settlement representing one half of defendant's IRA account. Two time-share properties were to be divided equally.
|
|||||
| National Hotel Props. v. Clinton Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV 980085800,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, November 22, 1999, Decided , November 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The local land use board, with discretion in interpreting its own regulations, did not abuse its discretion by approving an outdoor go-cart track site plan application submitted by the proposed lessees of the property.
|
|||||
| Pagliaro v. Jones, FA 980412430,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, November 22, 1999, Decided , November 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mother was not estopped from claiming that defendant was her child's father because mother did not do or say anything to induce him to believe that he was not the father and he was not prejudiced by mother's silence.
|
|||||
| Steiner v. Haddon, CV 980077938,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, November 22, 1999, Decided , November 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was granted to equipment owner because he was not liable for trespass in the absence of evidence that he actually entered on the land or that the logging operation was a common undertaking in which he actively participated.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
