|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 20, 2000
|
| |
Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Knudsen, CV 960393858S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 20, 2000, Decided , March 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Mercado v. Wal-Mart Stores, CV 990060680S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, March 20, 2000, Decided , March 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Summary judgment in favor of defendant retail store was proper where evidence did not show that defendant had either actual or constructive notice of a condition that caused plaintiff to slip and fall.
|
|
| |
Premier Dev. v. Thompson, CV 990089331,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 20, 2000, Decided , March 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Homeowners' affirmative defenses and counterclaims in response to builder's action to foreclose mechanic's lien were allowed except where they consisted only of conclusory statements.
|
|
| |
Schleifer v. Women's Health Group of Manchester, CV 000595684S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, March 20, 2000, Decided , March 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: To be entitled to prejudgment interest, plaintiff must show probable cause that judgment would enter in her favor on her allegations of discriminatory practices.
|
|
| |
Stosuy v. Board of Selectmen of Bolton, CV 9970569S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, March 20, 2000, Decided , March 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Stratton v. State, CV 99090648,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 20, 2000, Decided , March 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Plaintiff's bill of discovery was dismissed since plaintiff could obtain the desired records from defendant state through the state's Freedom of Information Act.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|