 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| JLG Collection Assocs. v. Forcade, DBDCV065000795S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 2, 2007, Decided , January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Creditor was not entitled to summary judgment on a claim seeking recovery of money it alleged was due on a defaulted loan, where defendant guarantor had called into question whether the creditor was a holder in due course of the loan instruments creating the debt obligation, and as to whether there was set-off to the debt claimed due.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. Jackson, FA054011722S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 2, 2007, Decided , January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the husband's medical malpractice claims were resolved by a settlement in which he was paid $ 175,000 up front and a lifetime annuity, guaranteed for 20 years, of $ 972 per week, as well as an annual payment of $ 15,000 for six years, the husband was to pay the wife alimony of $ 100 per week for four years, to be reduced thereafter.
|
|||||
| Jean v. L.A. Limousine of Greewich, LLC, CV064016486S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 2, 2007, Decided , January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to dismiss was denied, as plaintiffs complied with Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-473 regarding applications for injunctive relief, as trial court affirmed its decision to grant temporary injunctive relief and amended its orders, and plaintiffs served complaint in compliance with amended orders and filed bond, which trial court signed.
|
|||||
| Lalman v. Freehoffer, CV054005029,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 2, 2007, Decided , January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied a homeowner's breach of contract claim against a contractor, as the homeowner failed to prove the parties' contract was definite, but awarded the homeowner nominal damages and attorneys fees, under Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 20-427(c) and 42-110g(d), as the contractor failed to include notice of cancellation provisions in the contract.
|
|||||
| Lee v. Lee, MMXFA064005509,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the court found that, pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-56c(b)(4)(c), it was more likely than not that the parties would have provided support to their children for higher education if the family were intact, the parties were to share the educational expenses of their children until they reached the age of 23 or graduated from college.
|
|||||
| Mancarella v. Botting, MMXFA000091552S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As to financial issues, court found plaintiff in contempt of court orders, as plaintiff substantially ignored all of her financial obligations under the existing order. The decision was based upon economic considerations, but cost alone did not justify decision to ignore order. Request for contempt finding was denied as to vacation schedule.
|
|||||
| Mendoza v. Byrne, CV0640006255S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court ordered an evidentiary hearing to be held on whether it had personal jurisdiction over nurse; the claimant alleged that the nurse was a resident of Connecticut and the nurse alleged she resided in Vermont without minimum contacts with Connecticut, and issued needed to be resolved before matter could proceed.
|
|||||
| NAGE, Local R1-200 v. City of Bridgeport, AC 26919,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 2, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Association of government employees' motion to vacate arbitration award was properly denied because in concluding that article 2 of collective bargaining agreement, pertaining to management rights, applied to dispute regarding city employee's reinstatement, arbitrator did not manifestly disregard law in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-418(a)(4).
|
|||||
| Nocera v. Wagner & Wagner Auto Sales, Inc., CVN06052062,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 2, 2007, Decided , January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied the landlord's application for a Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-278 et seq. prejudgment remedy in the amount of $ 100,000; it was disputable whether the company was liable to the landlord under the lease holdover provisions, and a question existed about liability of subtenants to landlord since those two parties did not have a contract.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
