|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 2, 2004
|
| |
Barkyoumb v. Barkyoumb, FA020730057,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 2, 2004, Decided , January 2, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a wife's assets were the primary source of the down payment on a marital house, and where the parties' children's primary residence was ordered to be with her, she was granted the marital home, and a 50-50 division of the parties' assets.
|
|
| |
Barrett v. Barrett, FA020126298,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 2, 2004, Decided , January 2, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The parties' marriage was dissolved. The parties' child support obligations were established and the marital property was divided pursuant to a separation agreement, which the trial court found to be just and equitable.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Lin v. Amtrak, CV990431868,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 2, 2004, Decided , January 2, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Administrator of estate of decedent killed by train on railroad bridge could try to show railroad should have provided pedestrian walkway or place of refuge on bridge, as it was possible railroad had duty to provide for decedent's reasonable safety.
|
|
| |
Lin v. Amtrak, CV990431868,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 2, 2004, Decided , January 2, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The motion in limine of two railroads was denied in a wrongful death action, as issues of material fact existed as to trespassers and whether signs or other warning of dangers on the railroads' property should have been posted by the railroads.
|
|
| |
State v. Gardner, CR98273497,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 2, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a trial court found defendant violated probation and explained its reasons for revocation and imposition of the unexecuted portion of a sentence, its actions, within parameters of the Connecticut General Practice Book, could not be modified.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback