 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Agencies v. City of New Haven, CV99427681S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A travel agency recovered costs of plane and limousine tickets from its customer on the theory of unjust enrichment.
|
|||||
| Chongo v. Paredes, CV100016659,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 10, January 3, 2001, Decided , January 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where landlord failed for four months to install approved heating system in all habitable areas of rental unit, that failure materially endangered tenant's health and safety, and tenant was justified in withholding rent.
|
|||||
| Cosado v. Warden, 546083,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 3, 2001, Decided , January 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's sentence was improper where, pursuant to plea bargain, prosecutor agreed not to make a sentencing recommendation but stated at the hearing that petitioner had no redeeming qualities and deserved the maximum sentence.
|
|||||
| Harcut v. Harcut, 0118183,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 3, 2001, Decided , January 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court, after considering the relevant statutes and case law, ordered the marriage dissolved, periodic alimony, exclusive possession of the marital home to husband, and payment for one-half equity in the home, plus a sum to wife.
|
|||||
| In re La'Charles G., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUVENILE MATTERS, HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, January 3, 2001, Decided , January 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondent juvenile's motion to suppress was denied where his statements were made after a proper waiver, and both the waiver and the statements were made in the presence of respondent's parent.
|
|||||
| Kjersten Mills v. Connecticut Floor Supply, CV000178159,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 3, 2001, Decided , January 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff did not prove by clear and convincing evidence defendant's mechanic's lien was not timely filed, amount billed was based on incorrect square footage, or work was unworkmanlike, but plaintiff was entitled to credits.
|
|||||
| Kroha v. Lamonica, X02CV980160366S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, January 3, 2001, Decided , January 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A journal kept by a mother following the death of her daughter, made at the request of her attorney, was privileged even though the mother showed the journal to her husband, because it was done in mutual consultation about representation.
|
|||||
| Lefebvre v. State Deparment of Social Servs., CV990498804S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 3, 2001, Decided , January 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion for a renewed hearing following a decision affirming denial of benefits by the Department of Social Services was denied; good cause was not shown to justify a remand for the presentation of additional evidence.
|
|||||
| Maklad v. Maklad, FA000443796S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 3, 2001, Decided , January 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Divorce decree from foreign country was not recognized where neither party was domiciled in that country and party obtaining decree did not provide notice or opportunity to be heard to other party.
|
|||||
| Mercury Fuel Serv. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals Waterbury, CV000159988S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 3, 2001, Decided , January 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to dismiss appeal of zoning decision was granted where, in absence of showing of injury to plaintiffs' specific legal interest, claims alleging "unfair competition" were insufficient to confer standing.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
