|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 3, 2003
|
| |
|
| |
Baig v. D'Abundo, CV010379713S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 3, 2003, Decided , January 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney trial referee erred by concluding that it was the rate of interest a lender charged borrowers, and not the lender's intent in charging that rate, that determined whether Connecticut law barred lender from suing borrowers for nonpayment.
|
|
| |
Hima v. Foronda, FA980352612S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 3, 2003, Decided , January 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: An ex-husband's motion to modify child support was denied; the ex-husband failed to establish a substantial change in circumstances, as a purported loss of income was attributable to his careless spending and speculative investments.
|
|
| |
In re Chasidy A., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, JUVENILE MATTERS, January 3, 2003, Decided , January 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Parental rights were terminated based upon the parents' past history of substance abuse and their inability to rehabilitate themselves; accordingly, it was in the minor child's best interest to terminate the parental rights.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Neway v. Bogner, FA970348109S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 3, 2003, Decided , January 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A husband's motion to strike a wife's motion for contempt in a divorce action was denied; the wife alleged sufficient facts to withstand the husband's motion, and an agreement by the parties could not deprive the court of contempt authority.
|
|
| |
Olive St. Assocs. v. Benvenuti Oil Co., 554116,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 3, 2003, Decided , January 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A property owner having proven that a prior owner and its shareholders negligently failed to prevent oil spill(s) that polluted the property and failed to clean up the property, its remediation action was not barred by caveat emptor.
|
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Appeal from Probate, 390646,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 3, 2003, Decided , January 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The probate court erred in ordering that settlement proceeds be placed in escrow for the future payment of attorney and conservator fees unrelated to the settlement. The probate court lacked authority to set aside settlement proceeds for future fees.
|
|
| |
State v. Moreland, File Nos. FA93-0301602S, FA87-0245810S, FA93-0303639S, FA95-0325677S, FA93-0304994S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where an obligor was in arrears of court-ordered child support obligations, a state agency was entitled to 100 percent of the proceeds of a settlement; the State was not estopped by letters from a different state agency.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback