 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Abbott v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co., CV020191707,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 5, 2004, Decided , January 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer's failure to define "vandalism" in insurance policy rendered it vulnerable to other interpretations, including conduct based on ignorance. Thus, insurer was liable under the policy for damages caused when worker mistakenly cut up Persian rug.
|
|||||
| Am. Equip. Rentals v. Miro & Sons, 560209,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 5, 2004, Decided , January 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Subcontractor's lien was invalid, as required sworn oath was missing from mechanic's lien certificate, evidence did not show property owner consented to answer for lien, and subcontractor did not place lien on lessee's interest in real property.
|
|||||
| Asylum Hill Problem Solving Revitalization Ass'n v. King, (X02)CV030179515S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 5, 2004, Decided , January 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a three-count declaratory action, where a neighborhood organization alleged the director of housing finance authority violated state fair housing law, complaint was struck because the applicable statutes did not create a private right of action.
|
|||||
| Bonanno v. McMurray, 564076,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 5, 2004, Decided , January 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a painter had not agreed to a total cost to complete the work, but the work was poorly done and required correction, the owner was entitled to the amount it cost to repair the work minus the amount still owed to the painter.
|
|||||
| Borrero v. Bennett, CV010449451S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Given the minimal nature of the incident and the alleged injuries, the verdict did not shock the conscience of the court. The jury could have reasonably concluded that any alleged pain and suffering were the result of a prior accident.
|
|||||
| Comm'r of Transp. v. Schuchmann, CV020080255S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA MILFORD, GEOGRAPHIC AREA 5 AT DERBY, January 5, 2004, Decided , January 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a condemnation proceeding, the court determined that the value of the property taken was $ 13 per square foot and entered an award based on that finding.
|
|||||
| Czaplicki v. Ogren, CV020515486S, CV020518711S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 5, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court issued an injunction, as there was no evidence that an attempt had been made to collect on past due debts owed to a joint venture nor to enforce rental payments. A manager acted in his personal capacity in locking the entrance to a building.
|
|||||
| Hernandez v. Marquez, 377482,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 5, 2004, Decided , January 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff was entitled to prejudgment interest based on defendant's failure to respond to plaintiff's offer of judgment because, inter alia, the offer of judgment statute conferred a substantive right that could not be abridged by rules of practice.
|
|||||
| Landis v. Dep't of Envtl. Prot., 127137,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 5, 2004, Decided , January 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the environmental department did not rule on the application that was submitted and the trustees, as the real owners of the land, were aggrieved, the department's motion to dismiss was denied.
|
|||||
| Liu v. C. Pierce Enters., CV0210898,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 5, 2004, Decided , January 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Tenants were not entitled to order compelling specific performance of lease agreement, as lease had been terminated by notice to quit and judgment in summary process action for landlords, who were entitled to recover on their counterclaims.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
