 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Curtis v. Curtis, FA010182347S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 4, 2005, Decided , January 4, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court granted divorce and joint custody and parenting in accord with parents' detailed parenting plan, and awarded wife scheduled step down unallocated alimony and child support, as she could become self-sufficient as minor children got older.
|
|||||
| D'Antonio v. D'Antonio, FA020189763S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 4, 2005, Decided , January 4, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court determined the definition of income to be used to determine the husband's alimony and child support obligations based on the value of his law practice as a partner in a law firm.
|
|||||
| Damari Santos v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., CV040287435S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 4, 2005, Decided , January 4, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The note holder was entitled to summary judgment under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 17-49 in the owner's breach of oral contract action. The owner failed to file any affidavits or documentary evidence to support her allegations that the parties entered into an oral agreement. The note holder demonstrated the absence of any such agreement.
|
|||||
| DeLuca v. DeLuca, FA040093225S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 4, 2005, Decided , January 4, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C., X05CV000177475S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT STAMFORD, January 4, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A doctor who treated a patient was a learned intermediary regarding the dangers of slowing the rate of a pacemaker versus replacing a battery that had run down, so the manufacturer was not liable for injuries premised on a failure to warn.
|
|||||
| Jeudy v. Jeudy, FA030408666S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 4, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court dissolved a husband and wife's seven-year marriage after finding that it had broken down irretrievably. Because the husband had physically assaulted the wife during the course of the marriage, the court found that the fault for the breakdown of the marriage should be attributed to a greater extent to the husband.
|
|||||
| Maimore, Inc. v. Century 21 Across America, CV044001302,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 4, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Owner's motion to discharge a real property broker's lien on a parcel of property was dismissed; because the owner had sold his interest prior to filing the motion, the owner lacked standing, and the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Miller v. Simplex Grinnell, LTD, CV040287496S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 4, 2005, Decided , January 4, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Injured worker's public nuisance claim against company that cleaned a stove that later exploded was stricken; the stove was not in a public place and the worker failed to allege that her claim was based on her right as a member of the general public.
|
|||||
| Nicklas v. Nicklas, FA040410685S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 4, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The husband, who developed a serious personal relationship with another woman and showered his paramour with gifts, trips, and cruises, was found to be at fault for the breakdown of the marriage.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
