 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sciortino v. Town of Trumbull, CV 97344014S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, November 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Landowners failed to prove they had a legal right to have road improved because there were still administrative and procedural requirements that had to be met, and town had discretion over when to comply.
|
|||||
| State v. Daeira, CR 95114459,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, November 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Consecutive sentences imposed for second-degree attempted larceny and conspiracy to commit larceny were disproportionate in light of circumstances, including defendant's age, and the sentences imposed on other counts.
|
|||||
| State v. Gebeau, (AC 17412),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, November 23, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not entitled to jury instruction on second-degree robbery because defendant failed to show dispute as to use of firearm so that he could be acquitted of greater offense and convicted of lesser offense.
|
|||||
| State v. Mendez, CR 94451070, CR 8732658,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, November 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After reviewing petitioner's sentence under its mandated guidelines, the court found that it was appropriate and proportionate and affirmed the convictions for violation of probation and effective sentence of 10 years.
|
|||||
| State v. Suarez, MV 990639258S, MV 990638988S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, November 23, 1999, Decided , November 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because warrant was issued within statute of limitations period, and defendant failed to prove unreasonable delay in execution of the warrant, prosecution was initiated within meaning of statute of limitations.
|
|||||
| Thompson v. State Dep't of Social Servs., CV 980063936,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, November 23, 1999, Decided , November 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant, husband of medicaid recipient, lost the spousal exemption on residence when he transferred it to his daughter-in-law, thus his wife was no longer eligibility for benefits.
|
|||||
| Zigmund v. Leone, CV 990088494,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, November 23, 1999, Decided , November 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' motion to dismiss granted to extent plaintiff sought damages from defendants in their individual capacities under Patients' Bill of Rights, and in their official capacities under federal civil rights statute.
|
|||||
| Zigmund v. Young, CV 990088324,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, November 23, 1999, Decided , November 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' motion to dismiss granted to extent plaintiff sought damages from defendants in their individual capacities under Patients' Bill of Rights, and in their official capacities under a federal civil rights statute.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
