 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Pas Assocs. v. Twin Lab., FSTCV 990174428,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the proper party initiated lawsuit, no substitution occurred, and party was allowed to timely amend its complaint, motion to dismiss was denied.
|
|||||
| Scatena v. Rowland, CV 990593463,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, January 4, 2000, Decided , January 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No reason to make any order on defendant where petitioner prisoner who through his own diligence could accomplish his unfulfilled requests for certain materials in the practice of his Mormon faith.
|
|||||
| Solati v. Solati, FA 980417798,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 4, 2000, Decided , January 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dissolution of marriage granted to wife and husband, with joint custody of their minor child awarded, and husband ordered to quitclaim his interest in their home and pay child support.
|
|||||
| State v. Jackson, (AC 18439),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 4, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for stalking was affirmed because whether conduct constituted following depended on variety of differing factors in each case and issue was appropriate for decision by trier of fact.
|
|||||
| State v. Kellman, (AC 19110),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 4, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's challenge to the jury instructions on intoxication and defense of extreme emotional disturbance were rejected in part because the court refused to permit defendant to complain about the instructions that he requested.
|
|||||
| State v. Miranda, (AC 14439),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 4, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for first-degree assault against ab baby was reversed because the retroactive application of an unforeseeable judicial enlargement of the criminal statute operated as a constitutionally forbidden ex post facto law.
|
|||||
| TDS Painting & Restoration v. Copper Beach Farm, CV 920124488,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 4, 2000, Decided , January 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff awarded costs of collection in foreclosure action where there was no need to break down costs incurred between present action and counterclaim; plaintiff was entitled to costs provided in contract with defendant.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
