 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mountview Plaza Assocs., LLC v. Town of Naugatuck, CV010166658S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where property owners alleged that a borough was liable for people parking on the owners' land, the claims of inverse condemnation, ejectment, and unjust enrichment failed, but proven damages for trespass were awarded.
|
|||||
| Mullick v. Ancker Eagle, Inc., CV030091736,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 5, 2004, Decided , January 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In contract dispute between a seller and a buyer's assignee, who agreed to be bound by seller's and buyer's agreement, a demand for arbitration was unrestricted and the court could not review whether the assignee was bound by an arbitration clause.
|
|||||
| Reilly v. Colella, CV000181014,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 5, 2004, Decided , January 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Condominium association's summary judgment motion as to third-party action by a unit owner was denied; the owner adequately pled an indemnification claim, and an earlier grant of summary judgment against the injured party did not bind the owner.
|
|||||
| Town of N. Haven v. N. Haven Educ. Ass'n, CV030474463,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 5, 2004, Decided , January 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Issues pertaining to a stock distribution as a result of demutualization were subject to arbitration under the contract between the board of education and the education association. The town involved was a mere interloper in the dispute.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
