 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ramirez v. Progressive Northwestern Ins., CV040287431S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 4, 2005, Decided , January 4, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an insured's policy terms indicated that the insurer chose to contract out of the six-year statutory limitations requirement, the six year time limitation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-576(a) did not apply. Thus, the insured's suit which was not filed with the policy's time limitation periods, which exceeded three years, was untimely.
|
|||||
| Rapid Settlements v. Safeco Nat'l Life Ins. Co., CV044001979,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 4, 2005, Decided , January 4, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where payee sought to transfer his right to receive annual payments under workers' compensation settlement in exchange for lump sum payment, such arrangement was barred by settlement agreement, which deprived payee of power to transfer agreement.
|
|||||
| Renkewith v. Bobbi, CV044000554S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 4, 2005, Decided , January 4, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State court had jurisdiction over the dispute involving placement of a mailbox, since, among other things, Congress intended that state law and regulations would concurrently apply to the issue of mailbox placement along rural routes.
|
|||||
| Rubel v. Wainwright, (AC 23362),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 4, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment entered in favor of a driver following a jury's verdict for the driver was affirmed as the trial court properly instructed the jury regarding the driver's alleged negligence and recklessness and the defense of comparative negligence.
|
|||||
| Schub v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., (AC 25080),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 4, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred in denying motion to dismiss by Connecticut Department of Social Services in plaintiff's action alleging that the Department violated a court order by seizing his bank account because plaintiff's claims were barred by sovereign immunity.
|
|||||
| State v. Keaton, CR01550250,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 4, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence imposed was neither inappropriate nor disproportionate; the record revealed that the trial court considered petitioner's mental health concerns in fashioning its sentence.
|
|||||
| State v. Lefort, (AC 24456),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 4, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying defendant's application for pretrial alcohol education program where application was not made until after trial had already begun. Denial of jury's request to play back officer's testimony was not improper.
|
|||||
| State v. Potter, File No. MV-04 429333,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 4, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since motor vehicle violations were specifically excluded from the definition of a criminal offense, defendant's application for youthful offender status on a charge of negligent homicide with a motor vehicle was denied.
|
|||||
| State v. Sanders, (AC 24032),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 4, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Implicit weighing of prior misconduct evidence's probative value against prejudice was sufficient to support admission; failure to confront victim with prior inconsistent statement precluded admissibility later, as defense evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
