 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown v. Brookville Transp., 392820,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 4, 2001, Decided , January 4, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's summary judgment motion was denied where a statute of limitations extension applied, personal delivery was satisfied, service was proper, and delivery was established by subsequent affidavits.
|
|||||
| Daly v. Town of Windham, CV990061834S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT DANIELSON, January 4, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court denied plaintiff an injunction to enjoin the city from selling vacant land it acquired for, but no longer needed for, school grounds. Plaintiff did not have standing, as a taxpayer or as a voter, and did not prove irreparable harm.
|
|||||
| Ficarra v. Sidetex, Inc., CV97342262S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 4, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In negligence action, court granted manufacturer's summary judgment motion where plaintiff failed to offer sufficient evidence to raise genuine issue of material fact on whether manufacturer exerted control over work site.
|
|||||
| Giesing v. Blefeld, 549307,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 4, 2001, Decided , January 4, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The motion to quash defendant physician's subpoena duces tecum was granted where the confidentiality statute did not provide for disclosure of the type of records sought in the course of discovery in a civil action.
|
|||||
| King v. Stetson Sch., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 4, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court dismissed strict liability, absolute nuisance, and unfair trade practices counts for failure to allege sufficient facts, in a suit by the guardian of a sexually deviant minor against a residential facility housing the minor.
|
|||||
| Lucineo v. Science Park Dev. Corp., CV990370003,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 4, 2001, Decided , January 4, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mehler v. Stanley, CV970081533S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 4, 2001, Decided , January 4, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Matter involving alleged misrepresentations made when buyers bought home from seller was not appropriate for summary judgment when buyers had inspection done and then inquired further of seller about termites.
|
|||||
| Rosen v. Rosen, FA990362593S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 4, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Skindzier v. Commissioner of Social Servs., 0501376,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 4, 2001, Decided , January 4, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Husband's will's transfer of assets to two trusts for benefit of wife was not a disqualifying transfer for purposes of receiving Medicaid benefits.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
