Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Connecticut - January 6, 2003

  
Allen v. Allen, FA010728089, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Amgimon v. Debis Fin. Servs., CV02391470S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A former employee was granted a prejudgment remedy against a company, because the former employee presented sufficient evidence to support his claim that the company failed to deal with him in good faith when it refused to pay an incentive.

Search Cases for Free

  
Behrns v. Behrns, FA860229834S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Brown v. Heussner, FA010388582S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The parties' marriage was dissolved. The husband was ordered to pay support in the amount of $ 500 per week and alimony in the amount of $ 750 per week.

Search Cases for Free

  
Charles v. Downer, 398690, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a landlord failed to appear at a prejudgment remedy hearing, there was probable cause that a judgment would be rendered for the tenant, and the landlord's real estate could be attached.

Search Cases for Free

  
Ct Comm'r of Transp. v. Bakery Place, CV000503028S, CV000503209S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In condemnation proceedings involving two buildings, court based value of vacant building valuation for city tax purposes. Another building created steady flow of income, so court considered the income approach to value to be the most appropriate.

Search Cases for Free

  
Erlich v. Forest Land Corp., CV010453266, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Individual's self-serving affidavit was inadequate to overcome presumption of truth that attached to marshal's return, which indicated that abode service was properly made. Motion to open default judgment resulting from unexcused neglect was denied.

Search Cases for Free

  
Ex rel. Hassan H., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, JUVENILE MATTERS, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The parental rights of a mother and father to their son were terminated; the mother and father consented to the termination of parental rights, and the court found that the termination of parental rights was in the child's best interests.

Search Cases for Free

  
Greylock v. Collavino Northeast Constr. Co., CV020188647S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Subcontractor established probable cause to sustain the validity of a surety bond, and the property owner did not establish by clear and convincing evidence that the bond should be reduced or that the bond was not valid.

Search Cases for Free

  
King v. Johnson, CV913221, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, HOUSING SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear an action that was filed, pro se, by one partner who was attempting to represent his partnership in an eviction action against a tenant.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top