 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Atl. Nat'l Trust, LLC v. Van Eck, CV000443547S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2004, Decided , January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A bank did not agree to conditions claimed by a couple on the couple's payment to the bank; the couple released the $ 65,000 to the bank without any conditions, and they knew and agreed that the funds were going to debts of their son and his company.
|
|||||
| Barile v. Comm'r of Corr., (AC 23511),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 6, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeals court affirmed dismissal of habeas corpus petition; prisoner did not (1) challenge his sentence earlier, (2) directly appeal, (3) file motion to correct his sentence, (4) move to withdraw guilty plea, or (5) show why he did not do so.
|
|||||
| Becker v. Becker, FA020388516S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The parties' 30-plus year marriage was dissolved and the court assigned primary responsibility for the breakdown to the husband based on his affair. The wife was awarded substantial monthly alimony for life and 50 percent of most marital assets.
|
|||||
| Bermudez v. Malone, FA00631322S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a paternity/child support collection case, the arrearage timing for child support orders was three years next preceding the date of the signing of an acknowledgment of paternity.
|
|||||
| Burns v. Burns, FA020174482S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 6, 2004, Decided , January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The parties' marriage was dissolved, and orders were issued concerning child custody and parenting issues, alimony, life and medical insurance, property division, and attorney fees.
|
|||||
| Chiarelli v. DePrimo, CV010446428S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2004, Decided , January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' motion for nonsuit for an attorney's alleged repeated and willful non-compliance with court orders as to the revision of the attorney's complaint against defendants was denied and the attorney was given one more chance to comply.
|
|||||
| Cloke v. Lussier, FA960538398,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a mother was not in contempt of a stipulation with the father for taking the parties' child from Connecticut to Texas, the move was not in the child's best interests, and custody was awarded to the father.
|
|||||
| Collins v. Peerless Ins. Co., CV030194954,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the accidental failure of suit statute did not apply to time periods in insurance contracts, and because the filing rule in the parties' insurance policy was not met, the insurer was entitled to summary judgment on a breach of contract claim.
|
|||||
| Conn. Light & Power Co. v. St. John, (AC 23279),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 6, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although power company did not properly serve customers it sued, that fact affected trial court's ability to exercise personal jurisdiction, and customers waived lack of personal jurisdiction by failing to raise claim before they answered complaint.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
