|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 5, 2005
|
| |
|
| |
Conn. Coalition for Envtl. Justice v. Dev. Options, Inc., CV030828997S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 5, 2005, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Judgment was awarded to defendants in plaintiffs' action under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 22a-16 et seq. for injunctive relief in connection with development of retail center because destruction of meadow was not unreasonable; plants in meadow were common to those found throughout state, provided only poor quality habitat, and did not support rare species.
|
|
| |
Contractor's Supply of Waterbury, LLC v. Rocque, CV010808172,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 5, 2005, Decided , January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Property owner had standing to challenge constitutionality of a statute limiting siting of asphalt plants, as the use of its property was adversely affected by challenged law; whether it had valid permit at time of statute's enactment was immaterial.
|
|
| |
Delima v. Olmer, CV044002159S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 5, 2005, Decided , January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Ford v. Allstate Ins. Co., CV020389937*,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 5, 2005, Decided , January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Employee was exempt from overtime pay requirement where the evidence showed that the employee's duties were performed in an office or were non-manual work directly related to the management policies or general business operations of the employer, and the employee admittedly had some discretion and used some independent judgment when doing his job.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Guercia v. Conn. Post, LLP, CV030474056S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 5, 2005, Decided , January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Business was entitled to summary judgment where injured party alleged that she fell on defective sidewalk that was controlled by business. Business established that place where fall occurred was not part of leased premises.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Lindsay v. Lindsay, FA030082710S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 5, 2005, Decided , January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In divorce case, wife was awarded house because she needed it to support herself and maintain her day-care business. But, it was not equitable to have all the equity in home go to wife. Thus, wife would have to execute a note to husband for $ 12,500.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback