 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Amity Regional Sch. Dist. No. 5 v. Atlas Constr. Co., X06CV 970153388S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, November 24, 1999, Decided , November 24, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The dissolved status of corporation apportionment defendant did not deprive the court of jurisdiction, and service of the complaint on the statutory agent for apportionment defendant was proper.
|
|||||
| Bowden v. Connecticut Valley, 116782,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, November 24, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff was not entitled to the large compensation, consultant's fee, and company stock that he claimed, because plaintiff failed to prove the various implied or oral agreements he allegedly had with defendants.
|
|||||
| Carroll v. Sullivan, 543814,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, November 24, 1999, Decided , November 24, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's notice of intent to sue for injuries suffered from bicycle fall adequately identified cause, location, and defect, and bicyclists traveling on highways or sidewalks were covered under the highway defect statute.
|
|||||
| Dreher v. Dreher, 385456, 38 54 56,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, November 24, 1999, Decided , November 24, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ekeinde v. Ekeinde, FA 980331914S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, November 24, 1999, Decided , November 24, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The marriage between the parties was dissolved, and orders were issued concerning the custody and visitation of the children, alimony, support of plaintiff wife and the children, and the division of the property.
|
|||||
| Elliott v. Elliott, FA 980415733S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, November 24, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dissolution of marriage action, the court dissolved the marriage, awarded custody, child support, and alimony to the wife, divided the property, and ordered restrictions on husband's visitation rights with the children.
|
|||||
| Esposito v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., CV 960392177S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, November 24, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff gave no legal theory on which arbitrator's award against insurer should be vacated so motion to vacate was denied; dispute having been resolved through arbitration, the underlying action was settled and dismissed.
|
|||||
| Gardner v. St. Paul Catholic High Sch., CV 9701435515,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, November 24, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an employee's action arising out of employment termination, the employer's motion to strike breach of contract count was denied; the motion to strike three other counts was granted.
|
|||||
| Guedelha v. Guedelha, FA 980332630S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, November 24, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dissolution of marriage action, the court dissolved the marriage, and awarded custody, child support, and alimony to the wife, divided the property, and ordered the husband to attend counseling with the minor daughter.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
