|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 6, 2003
|
| |
Krom v. Krom, FA970714850S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, FAMILY SUPPORT MAGISTRATE DIVISION AT HARTFORD, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although the return of service contained the wrong address, and the father claimed he was never served, credible testimony, including that of the officer who performed the abode service, established that service was completed at the father's home.
|
|
| |
|
| |
McGrath v. McGrath, FA010384549S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a dissolution of marriage action, no alimony was ordered, child support was ordered, the wife was given possession of the marital home purchased with her own funds, and each party was given their own pension plans.
|
|
| |
Perras v. Allstate Ins. Co., CV020067400,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Breach of contract count was bifurcated from other counts where bifurcation might be dispositive of other counts. Convenience, negation of prejudice, and judicial efficiency warranted that breach of contract count be tried first, during jury phase.
|
|
| |
Perras v. Allstate Ins. Co., CV020067400,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In an action to recover UIM benefits, since there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether an alleged tortfeasor was negligent in the operation of his vehicle, neither the insurer nor the insured was entitled to summary judgment.
|
|
| |
Reiner v. Reiner, FA000725148,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a dissolution of marriage action, the husband was ordered to pay $ 1,350 as weekly alimony and $ 200,000 in lump sum alimony. The husband was awarded the family home, and ordered to pay the wife one half of the equity in the home.
|
|
| |
Samperi v. Quental, CV020469047S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Sandquist v. Shaw, CV000504565S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a passenger did not support an allegation of a breach of a duty owed by a motor vehicle owner, the passenger did not allege facts to support a cause of action for negligence; a motion to strike could be granted.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback