 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cweklinsky v. Mobil Chem. Co., (SC 16846),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 6, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Supreme court did not recognize a cause of action for compelled self-publication defamation based on a former employee's compelled self-publication of a former employer's defamatory statements made only to the former employee.
|
|||||
| Davis v. Davis, FA020564227,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The mother's motion for contempt alleging that the father disobeyed the trial court's pendente lite order regarding child support was denied. The mother failed to demonstrate that the father willfully failed to obey the order.
|
|||||
| East Haven Builders Supply v. Fanton, (AC 23212),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 6, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by vacating a judgment that was entered in favor of a building supply company after a customer agreed to accept the company's offer to settle its action seeking payment on an account, and entering a new judgment in company's favor.
|
|||||
| Ferrigno v. Lauzier Constr. Co., CV030482422,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2004, Decided , January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the parties' construction contract did not satisfy the mandatory requirements of the Home Improvement Act, a contractor's mechanic's lien was unenforceable; as a result, the owners' application to discharge the lien was granted.
|
|||||
| Fleet Nat'l Bank's Appeal from Probate, (SC 16905),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 6, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a bank was removed as trustee of an irrevocable trust due to the unanimous request of the beneficiaries, such removal was not "for cause" and the bank lacked standing to appeal that removal; further, the bank was not classically "aggrieved."
|
|||||
| Fogarty, Cohen; Selby, Nemiroff; L.L.C. v. Bell, CV030195435,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a law firm showed probable cause that it would prevail in its action against a former client to recover for fees she allegedly owed, the court allowed a prejudgment remedy of attachment against real estate owned by the client.
|
|||||
| Fournier-Lefebvre v. Lefebvre, FA010067046S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 6, 2004, Decided , January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The marriage was dissolved. The husband was to retain the marital home with each party keeping their savings. The parties were responsible for their own medical coverage and copays. The wife retained all vacation time-shares. No fees were awarded.
|
|||||
| Harding v. Harding, FA030399727S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the parties' marriage had broken down irretrievably, it was dissolved; the parties were awarded joint legal custody of their children, the husband was to pay child support and alimony.
|
|||||
| In re Travis R., (AC 23919),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 6, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeals court affirmed denial of mother's motion to reopen termination decision; evidence conflicted but supported trial court's decision that mother was not under duress or under claimed threats from social worker when consenting to termination.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
