 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Gritz, CR 96103069,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, January 5, 2000, Decided , January 5, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Search was constitutional because police had reasonable and articulable suspicion to support investigative stop of vehicle found on school grounds; patdown and vehicle searches were incident to lawful arrest for loitering.
|
|||||
| State v. Gritz, CR 96103069,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, January 5, 2000, Decided , January 5, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police had affirmative duty to inform defendant that attorney was attempting to speak with him, and duty commenced with attorney's first phone call to department.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
