 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Brown, CR97241699,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence review division was limited in review to decide only if the sentence imposed was inappropriate or disproportionate in light of the offense, offender, the protection of public interest, and purposes for which the sentence was intended.
|
|||||
| Teal v. Smiley, FA970624195S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, FAMILY SUPPORT MAGISTRATE DIVISION AT HARTFORD, January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Putative father's motion to open default paternity judgment was granted. While abode service was made, he did not actually know of proceeding; the motion was filed within four months of notice of default, and he presented a meritorious defense.
|
|||||
| Washburn v. Potter, CV020515312S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 6, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Owner was not vicariously liable for double or treble damages to injured party as result of car accident involving family car, driven by owner's wife, since common law provided that a vicariously liable person was not liable for punitive damages.
|
|||||
| Wason v. Myer, CV980164806,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 6, 2003, Decided , January 6, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As the evidence would not compel the trier of fact to reach the conclusion that was proposed in a summary judgment motion, the motion was denied to a vehicle owner attempting to rebut the presumption that a driver of the vehicle was her agent.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
