|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 6, 2004
|
| |
Milligan v. W&M Prop. of Conn., Inc., X06CV010179632S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 6, 2004, Decided , January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where an administrator was not a joint tortfeasor against whom a common-law claim of indemnity could be brought and where an action had not terminated in a company's favor, those counts in the company's counterclaim were struck.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Serra v. Watts Regulator Co., CV020472431S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2004, Decided , January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where the proximity of a resident to a boiler in his home, even for unrelated repair and inspection, was not so inconsequential or tenuous so as to defeat the substantial factor requirement, the manufacturer's motion to strike was denied.
|
|
| |
Smalley v. Smalley, CV030476049S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2004, Decided , January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The parties' marriage of nearly eight years was dissolved and they were to share joint and physical custody of their twin children, with the husband to pay alimony for a three year-term and the wife to buy out the husband's share of the marital home.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Waites, CR10224328,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 6, 2004, Decided , January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A probationer was always under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Correction and was thus never "released from such imprisonment" where he never was successfully discharged from parole, and therefore his probation had not commenced.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Yolles v. Golf Club of Avon, Inc., CV000802636,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 6, 2004, Decided , January 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Golf club was entitled to summary judgment in member's action alleging discrimination on the basis of her sex because the club's initiation fee structure and tournament tee-off rules did not deny the member of equal access to membership.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback