 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Commissioner of Transp. v. Holdridge, 0546735,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court adjusted the value of property in a condemnation proceeding in appellants' favor based upon appellants' appraiser's more credible testimony.
|
|||||
| Denby v. Denby, CV 970398113, CV 980412501, CV 970405427,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2000, Decided , January 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Habeas corpus relief for ineffective trial and habeas counsel denied because defendant did not meet burden of proving both objective ineffectiveness and actual prejudice in performance of both attorneys.
|
|||||
| Dunsmore & Assocs. v. D'Alessio, 409906,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2000, Decided , January 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A former employee was liable for misappropriating the former employer's market research candidate list because the list was a protected trade secret and the fees collected were a measure of unjust enrichment; punitive damages were not appropriate.
|
|||||
| Fernandez v. Giarratana, CV 970404961, CV97-0404961,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: If there was a defect of which landlord was aware, and that defect caused tenant's damages then the injury could have resulted from the active or primary negligence of condominium association, for indemnification purposes.
|
|||||
| Hoover v. Dunsmore & Assocs., 416894,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2000, Decided , January 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered in favor of recruiter who terminated his employment with placement agency in breach of contract action. Recruiter was entitled to commissions earned prior to his resignation.
|
|||||
| P&D Enters. v. Restifo, CV 990431055S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2000, Decided , January 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Application for prejudgment remedy was denied, because surface water agreement encumbering the property rendered the title unmarketable and defendants were justified in refusing to close title to the property.
|
|||||
| Polk v. New Milford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV 990079474,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 6, 2000, Decided , January 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Board's granting of variance was affirmed because adherence to setback and lot area requirements would have caused hardship because of ledge and steepness and variance did not substantially affect comprehensive zoning plan.
|
|||||
| Romagna v. Witkins, CV 98062572S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 6, 2000, Decided , January 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Purchasers were entitled to return of real estate deposit because real estate contract was subject to sewer hookup and purchasers acted reasonably in their efforts to obtain a satisfactory estimate for sewer hookup.
|
|||||
| Seibold v. Town of New Milford Bd. of Educ., CV 980078042,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 6, 2000, Decided , January 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In negligence action, motion for summary judgment by municipality and its board of education was granted because plaintiffs had not sued any municipal employees in their individual capacity within statute of limitations.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
