 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ardery v. Ardery, FA890362688,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 5, 2001, Decided , January 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Husband's motion to modify alimony was granted, since his business had not realized enough revenue to permit him to take more than a nominal income.
|
|||||
| Bowen v. Stonegate Condo. Ass'n, CV980416453,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 5, 2001, Decided , January 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Condo association, as property owner, owed a nondelegable duty to keep premises safe, as did property manager. Therefore, plaintiff's and snow removal subcontractor's motions to strike apportionment complaint were granted.
|
|||||
| Chapell v. Larosa, CV990552801,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 5, 2001, Decided , January 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Victim of an automobile accident was not a third party beneficiary of the contract between tortfeasor and his insurer. He also had no Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act claims against insurer.
|
|||||
| Collins v. Anthem Health Plans, Inc., X01CV990156198S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, January 5, 2001, Decided , January 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where individual doctors lacked standing in suit against health plan that had entered into contracts with doctors' professional corporations, court could not require doctors' corporations to assert claims against health plans.
|
|||||
| Connecticut Indep. Labor Union v. Connecticut State Bd. of Labor Rels., CV000502315S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court dismissed a union's appeal of a state labor board's decision that nullified a vote for the union to represent a unit. The union had to approach the employer and ask to bargain on behalf of the unit as a condition precedent to appeal.
|
|||||
| Crabtree v. Smith, CV980063477S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 5, 2001, Decided , January 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City planner's motion for summary judgment in zoning enforcement action was denied because there existed disputes of material fact as to whether alleged violators had appealed planner's original cease and desist order.
|
|||||
| Debernardi v. Debernardi, FA000499637S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 5, 2001, Decided , January 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the husband's infidelity was the main cause of the breakdown of the parties' marriage, the wife was awarded alimony and the marital home, and she was to be the primary residential parent for the children.
|
|||||
| Estefan v. Rolls, (X02)CV990159309S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, January 5, 2001, Decided , January 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut personal injury plaintiff waived all possible objections to reasonable request to compel independent physical examination by failing to object timely to scope of exam or identity of examining physician.
|
|||||
| Gustafson v. Dlugolenski, CV990068576S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 5, 2001, Decided , January 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In personal injury action where defendant did not plead special defenses and did not respond to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and court found there were no issues of fact, summary judgment as to liability was granted to plaintiff.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
