 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Beal Bank v. Airport Indus. L.P., (AC 22431),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 7, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A mortgage foreclosure action was not the proper proceeding to determine the respective rights of a mortgage assignee and its debtors with respect to commercial tenant security deposits where the tenants had not been made parties to the proceeding.
|
|||||
| Blumenthal v. Sharon Hosp., CV020088537S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 7, 2003, Decided , January 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut's attorney general properly looked out for the proper treatment of charitable gifts by documenting the propriety of transferring various charitable gifts from a nonprofit hospital to the chain that bought it.
|
|||||
| Chekroun v. Brandford Bd. of Educ., CV010451079,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 7, 2003, Decided , January 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The motion to strike the first count of plaintiffs' amended complaint was granted because that count attempted to state a claim for negligence directly against the education board, and such a claim was not permitted.
|
|||||
| Cohen v. Hanley, FA940311585S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 7, 2003, Decided , January 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mother was not entitled to modification of child support where decrease in income was due to her actions. Motion for contempt was denied where mother failed to prove father willfully failed to comply with support order. Wage execution was entered.
|
|||||
| Comm'r of Transp. v. Kahn, (SC 16714),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 7, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the commissioner had waived the statute of limitation argument in an eminent domain proceeding and even though notice had not properly been given by the court of the owner's application for a reassessment, the trial court had jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Fernandez v. Fernandez, FA880352048,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, FAMILY SUPPORT MAGISTRATE DIVISION AT HARTFORD, January 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court determined that a father owed no child support arrearage to the mother or to the State of Connecticut. Thus, a motion to vacate wage withholding was moot.
|
|||||
| Garcia v. Amaranto, CV980355695S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 7, 2003, Decided , January 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a judgment creditor sought to avoid the judgment debtor's transfer of his interest in a house to his sister, the sister's motion for summary judgment was denied due to the existence of genuine issues of material fact.
|
|||||
| Goodspeed Airport v. Town of E. Haddam, X07CV010076811S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT TOLLAND, January 7, 2003, Decided , January 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Issues surrounding two businesses and an individual's application for temporary injunction could be fully considered and resolved in pending case and, thus, motion to dismiss application was granted based on prior pending case doctrine.
|
|||||
| Lopez v. Warden, CV013356,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 7, 2003, Decided , January 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate had no constitutional right to have witnesses present in-person testimony at his prison disciplinary hearings and thus, there was no basis for relief on his habeas corpus petition because he was afforded all of the process that he was due.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
