 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Aube v. Middlesex Hosp., CV040488844S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since a hospital's apportionment complaint against a laboratory really was not concerned with apportionment, but was really an extended denial of any negligence on the hospital's part coupled with the corollary claim that if any entity was negligent it was the laboratory, the laboratory's motion to strike the complaint was denied.
|
|||||
| Christensen v. Reed, CV030070458,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 6, 2006, Decided , January 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the conveyances in a plaintiff's chain of title did not provide any notice as to a right of way and the claim was not recorded within forty years, the Marketable Record Title Act (MRTA), Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 47-33b - 47-33l, barred plaintiff's claim to a right of way across defendants' property.
|
|||||
| Defeo v. Defeo, TTDFA040083873S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 6, 2006, Decided , January 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since, when the husband filed his petition in bankruptcy, he lost control over the disposition of that property and a stay of the enforcement of the court orders was effected, the court was unable to find that the husband wilfully and deliberately refused to comply with the property orders issued by the court in the judgment of dissolution.
|
|||||
| Dinan & Dinan, PC v. Dampf, CV030405967S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 6, 2006, Decided , January 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In the law firm's action against the former client to collect an unpaid fee, the trial court found in favor of the law firm. While the client was generally dissatisfied with the law firm's representation, she failed to refute the unreasonableness of the fee or to challenge the time allegedly spent on the case.
|
|||||
| Fleming v. Asea Brown Boveri, Inc., CV990586460,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 6, 2006, Decided , January 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the employer could not justify reducing an employee's pay by the amount of his legislative compensation he received as a state legislator, as Conn. Gen. Stat. § 2-3a did not permit that, and the employee received less pay than a commensurate position, the employee was owed back pay.
|
|||||
| In re Forgione, File No. CR-05 1845500,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2006, Decided , January 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Family members' motion for the return of unlawfully seized computer items under U.S. Const. amends. IV and XIV and Conn. Const. art. I, §§ 7 and 8, as well as for the return of their seized internet subscriber information was denied because they failed to meet their burden of proving that two search warrants that were issued were unconstitutional.
|
|||||
| Manosh v. Rivard, FA970114064,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 6, 2006, Decided , January 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut family support magistrate abused discretion in ordering father incarcerated for nonpayment of child support arrearages despite evidence that parents and children were living as intact family and that no support was sought or owed.
|
|||||
| Markley v. Lewis, CV044000119S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 6, 2006, Decided , January 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered in favor of a creditor as to breach of contract claims against a debtor, as the contracts concerning transfers of real property were not barred by the statute of frauds, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53-550(a)(5), as the repayment could have occurred within one year following origination of the loans in question.
|
|||||
| Mason v. Budin, CV054012570,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 6, 2006, Decided , January 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
