 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sosin v. Scinto, CV 980419626S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to dismiss contract action was denied; even if case was not ripe when filed, court had jurisdiction since claims had become ripe; prior pending action doctrine did not apply since prior action was no longer "pending."
|
|||||
| State v. Encarnacion, FA 990627867,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, January 6, 2000, Decided , January 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because family support magistrates can enter temporary orders of child support, a later magistrate's finding that an earlier magistrate's "temporary" order was really permanent was not necessary.
|
|||||
| Walton v. Duct & Vent Cleaning of Am., CV 990089850S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 6, 2000, Decided , January 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiff had a heightened pleading requirement, duplication of facts was sufficient to plead claim of recklessness, and motion to strike that claim was denied.
|
|||||
| Weyel v. Catania, CV 940361996,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff was reimbursed for two-thirds of remaining 71 hours under consideration regarding attorneys fees; court denied defendants' motion for sanctions and plaintiff's motions for contempt and attorneys fees post-appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
