 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Leonhardt v. Leonhardt, FA010727454S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 7, 2004, Decided , January 7, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parties' marriage was dissolved. The husband was ordered to pay the wife $ 400,000 where the appreciation of the parties' assets during the 15-year marriage was between $ 1,900,275, as the wife argued, and $ 655,788, as the husband argued.
|
|||||
| Martinez v. Zovich, CV030519983S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 7, 2004, Decided , January 7, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where buyers of property explicitly agreed that they were not relying on any representations regarding use of the property in purchasing it, they could not allege that the seller's representations induced them into buying the property.
|
|||||
| McDonald v. Squeglia, CV010452868S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 7, 2004, Decided , January 7, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where tenants argued that they sent notice three months before termination of lease that they were not renewing lease, trial court disagreed. Landlord behaved in manner consistent with his assertion that he never received such notice.
|
|||||
| Menzano v. Rain Desert, LLC, CV030070396,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 7, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Club's special defense alleging that wanton and reckless conduct by an injured party caused an auto accident was stricken; by law, the minor was incompetent to understand the effects of alcohol, and thus could not have acted recklessly.
|
|||||
| Onyx Arbor Hills Landfill, Inc. v. Nat'l Waste Assocs., CV020818142,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 7, 2004, Decided , January 7, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A garbage hauling service was owed $ 33,748 by a broker, where the broker failed to carry its burden of proof on its special defense, and statutory interest was appropriate on a portion of the debt that was not seriously contested by the broker.
|
|||||
| Reed v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Branford, CV030475239,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 7, 2004, Decided , January 7, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court approved agreement settling owner's appeal of zoning board's denial of variance, as proper notice of settlement was given, there was no collusion, citizens' grounds for objecting to settlement were not compelling, and owner's appeal had merit.
|
|||||
| Reyes v. Warden, Raqgowski C.I., 562900,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 7, 2004, Decided , January 7, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although an inmate suffered pain in his knee, his conservative treatment by the warden's medical staff was reasonable under the circumstances; therefore, the inmate did not prove the grounds for a writ of habeas corpus.
|
|||||
| Townsend v. Tegeler, CV030481632,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 7, 2004, Decided , January 7, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an inmate did not allege that a civil liberties union member was a state actor or that the affect of a consent decree in a different case was different for one race than for another, the complaint failed to state a cause of action.
|
|||||
| White v. Thornton Oil Corp., CV010455245S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 7, 2004, Decided , January 7, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Oil company's summary judgment motion as to a former employee's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim was denied; if true, a supervisor's claimed falsification of receipts in order to fire the employee would support the claim.
|
|||||
| Wright v. State, CV030193107S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 7, 2004, Decided , January 7, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's evidence did not involve extraneous influences on a jury, but related to the mental processes of an individual juror, it was inadmissible to attack the jury's verdict; the State's motion to strike was granted.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
