 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Parrott, (SC 16756),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 7, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel's unwillingness to sit near defendant indicated a potential conflict of interest, but the court's inquiry and absence of prejudice prevented a finding of error; a prosecutor's comment was also not reversible error.
|
|||||
| Statewide Griev. Comm. v. Ankerman, (AC 22299),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 7, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a disciplinary proceeding, a trial court properly denied an attorney's motion for a mistrial because the trial court's judgment was rendered in a timely manner where the case had been opened for an additional hearing on the matter of disposition.
|
|||||
| Suger v. Suger, FA880097375S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where it was unclear whether husband had violated separation agreement's requirement that he pay certain alimony and forward to wife documents about his retirement income, wife was granted a hearing to present evidence or to show need for discovery.
|
|||||
| Tonetti v. Barth, CV020087784S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 7, 2003, Decided , January 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion to strike a driver's special defense of comparative negligence was granted as there was no common law duty of a motorcyclist to wear high visibility clothing during the daylight hours.
|
|||||
| Velez v. Torres, FA960621680,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, FAMILY SUPPORT MAGISTRATE DIVISION AT HARTFORD, January 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Laches barred a father barred from opening a paternity acknowledgment. The father had sufficient opportunity to have paternity tests prior to the entry of judgment, but he did not exercise reasonable diligence in pursuing such opportunities.
|
|||||
| Wright v. Warden, CV972399,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 7, 2003, Decided , January 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Guilty pleas on disciplinary reports were not voluntarily entered into by inmate where signatures on disciplinary reports were distinctly different from inmate's signatures on petition for habeas relief and supporting financial affidavit.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
