 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Twelfth BRT Dev., LLC v. Danbury Planning Comm'n, CV054003916S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, January 5, 2007, Decided , January 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal of denial of application for special exception under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-2 was dismissed as denial of application was supported by substantial evidence. Zoning commission could reject testimony of owner and developer's expert since intersection was treacherous place, and in four years, 16 accidents were reported around avenue.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. Bradley, File No. CV-06 5001119S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 5, 2007, Decided , January 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to strike a claim against the parents of a teenage party giver under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 30-86 was granted; § 30-86 was a criminal statute that did not provide a private right of action against the parents based on the provision of alcohol to minors who attended their son's party.
|
|||||
| Worldwide Props., LLC v. Zoning Comm'n of Brookfield, DBDCV054004496,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 5, 2007, Decided , January 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A purchaser of real property was properly considered an "owner," as that term was used in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-3(b), and it was entitled to file a protest petition against a zoning commission's anticipated zone change; as a two-thirds majority vote was not reached for purposes of changing the zoning in that instance, the zone change was invalid.
|
|||||
| Yi v. Grenfell, CV0300480862S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 5, 2007, Decided , January 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a personal injury action, following the default of both an automobile owner and its driver, the court awarded special damages to a bicyclist after deducting collateral source payments and non-economic damages for a total of $38,424.60; the court declined to award double damages under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-295.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
