 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Amoroso v. Flynn, CV9976134S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 7, 2002, Decided , January 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ex-husband did not establish existence of contract or entitlement to repayment of loan since there was no meeting of the minds. Ex-wife voluntarily made payments on unenforceable debt.
|
|||||
| Arrow Elecs. v. Fed. Ins. Co., X01CV000167080,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 7, 2002, Decided , January 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where insureds failed to give proper and timely notice of occurrence of EPA claim, insurance carriers were not liable for benefits or defense costs under policies unless insureds proved that insurance carriers were not prejudiced.
|
|||||
| COMMISSIONER OF ADMIN. SERVS. v. JENKINS, CV000599367S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Executrix could not prove statements were made by someone with authority or that decedent relied on them to her detriment; statements were hearsay. Executrix could not establish inequity in reimbursing hospital costs.
|
|||||
| Conn. Fair Plan v. High Plains Land Co., CV990156099S, CV000156691S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 7, 2002, Decided , January 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the city and bank sought to enforce tax, demolition, and water use liens against the mortgagee's fire insurance policy proceeds, the tax and demolition liens had priority over the insurance proceeds, but the water use lien did not.
|
|||||
| Jalbert v. Stanziale, CV010454543S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 7, 2002, Decided , January 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to strike was granted where court found that even if defendant's actions usurped plaintiff's expectation interest, defendant's actions did not qualify as anything more than intracorporate dispute, which did not constitute trade act violation.
|
|||||
| Katz v. Norden Mech. Servs., CV010807323S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 7, 2002, Decided , January 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lackard v. Vandecar, CV010806605S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 7, 2002, Decided , January 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In automobile negligence action, the driver's special defense that the wife/victim's injuries were due to the husband's negligence was legally insufficient as the driver did not allege any negligence on the part of the wife.
|
|||||
| McDonald v. Anderson, CV000083364S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Contractor's failure to complete clearing of trees from property represented breach of contract. Property owner failed to make reasonable effort to contact contractor and give him opportunity to complete work before hiring third party.
|
|||||
| Noble v. Moore, CV980148207,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 7, 2002, Decided , January 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut law applied to car accident case, precluding evidence regarding injured party's failure to wear seat belt. Although accident occurred in New York, parties were all from Connecticut. Thus, Connecticut had greater interest.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
