 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bowden Dev., T.L.I., LLC. v. Taus, CV040104241, CV040103938,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 7, 2005, Decided , January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the contractor held himself out as an experienced and competent contractor who knew or should have known of the town's requirements regarding the driveway, he could not escape liability for constructing an illegal driveway.
|
|||||
| Buddington Park Condo. Ass'n v. Taverna, CV030082826S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 7, 2005, Decided , January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In lien holder's foreclosure action that arose out of residents' failure to pay common expenses assessments and fines for condominium, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing special defense was not valid defense to foreclosure action.
|
|||||
| Cramer v. Adm'r, CV040199684,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 7, 2005, Decided , January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Finding that employee did not intentionally mislead her employer was proper where there was no evidence that the employee knew that her previous employer let her go because of poor work performance, and not for lack of work, as she told employer.
|
|||||
| Ferrigno v. Cromwell Dev. Assocs., CV880253032,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 7, 2005, Decided , January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After reviewing the evidence in a deficiency hearing, the court accepted the tax assessor's valuation of a property per the assemblage doctrine, denied the debtor's request to reduce the interest rate on the judgment debt, declined to adjust the damages the creditor claimed based on the court's delay, and awarded reasonable attorney's fees.
|
|||||
| Iorio v. Sherman IGA, CV010162720S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied defendant corporation's summary judgment motion, as it did not clearly show that it was not in existence or not responsible for its corporate, partnership, and individual predecessor owners on the date that a shelf fell on plaintiff.
|
|||||
| Lake Rd. Properties, L.L.C. v. Suffield Zoning & Planning Comm'n, CV040832682S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Zoning and planning commission's imposition, pursuant to Suffield, Conn., Zoning Regs. § 6.13.1, of conditions to grant of special use permit requiring private drive to be built certain way was improper. Regulations gave commission no authority to require applicant to construct private drive to imposed standards.
|
|||||
| Magnotta v. Manemeit, CV030101427S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 7, 2005, Decided , January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action to clear title to certain real property, the court found an easement was of no force and effect, and judgment was entered for plaintiffs, clearing title to their premises.
|
|||||
| McLaren v. Bowden Dev., 5662233,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 7, 2005, Decided , January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a suit for breach of a construction contract from delay, judgment was entered for plaintiffs for $ 16,986; the house was delivered nine days late, and the certificate of occupancy was approved over two months late.
|
|||||
| Mingolello v. Conn. Light & Power, CV040286632S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 7, 2005, Decided , January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Injured party's motion pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-212a to open a default judgment against him in a personal injury action was denied; the injured party failed to show that he had a good and compelling reason for opening the judgment.
|
|||||
| Mortgage Elec. Registration Sys. v. Pressman, CV030194914S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 7, 2005, Decided , January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the mortgagor's special defenses, as viewed by the court through the lens of the equitable discretion governing the mortgage foreclosure cases, properly challenged the ability of the corporation and bank to enforce the note and mortgage at issue, the motion to strike the special defenses was denied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
