 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Newbury Vill., LLC v. Water Pollution Control Auth., DBDCV064005712,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 8, 2007, Decided , January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a condominium association and property owners alleged that a water pollution control authority illegally levied an assessment under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-250, the prior pending action doctrine did not apply because prior cases cited different reasons for the relief requested, alleging that it was wrong in its assessment calculation.
|
|||||
| Strategic BCICFC Acquisitions v. Grant, CV054015561,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 8, 2007, Decided , January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A city assigned its rights to collect real property taxes to plaintiff, which sued defendant to recover such taxes. Defendant bought property that the city had foreclosed on for delinquent property taxes; as the city's foreclosure complaint had included claims for the taxes assignee sought to recover from defendant, plaintiff's claim failed.
|
|||||
| Woodside Apt., LLC v. Wilkerson, HDSP138943,,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, HOUSING SESSION AT HARTFORD, January 8, 2007, Decided , January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered in favor of defendant as to a managing agent's summary process action based on nonpayment of rent because the evidence indicated that defendant mailed a check for rent in a timely fashion and the agent bore the risk of loss as it required defendant to mail rent checks.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
