 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Baughman v. Collins, (AC 18496),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, November 30, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a police report contained unredacted hearsay statements, it was not admissible as a business record. Where statements were hearsay, the requests for admission concerning the statements were not competent evidence.
|
|||||
| Branhaven Plaza v. Inland Wetlands Comm'n of Branford, (SC 16141),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, November 30, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant commission could not accept monetary and in-kind contributions from defendant permittee in mitigation for damage to wetlands from an unspecified future project.
|
|||||
| Citibank v. Cronin, CV 980420550S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, November 30, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to open judgment of dismissal denied where plaintiff was not prevented by accident, mistake, or other reasonable cause from appearing at trial, and motion itself was deficient.
|
|||||
| Fisher v. Warden, CV 960323342S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, November 30, 1999, Decided , November 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner for writ of habeas corpus failed to present credible evidence that he was surprised by alleged false testimony or that his trial outcome might have differed without it, and witness' recantation was not credible.
|
|||||
| Garguilo Constr. v. Consulting, CV 99427426S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, November 30, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's negligence complaint denied because it improperly claimed the complaint was for breach of contract requiring plaintiff to allege privity, which was not necessary in a negligence suit.
|
|||||
| In re Adelina G., (AC 19039),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, November 30, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment terminating respondent's parental rights was affirmed, because issues were not properly briefed.
|
|||||
| In re John G., (AC 17965),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, November 30, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where respondent mother failed to show she rehabilitated herself, that she had not statutorily abandoned her child, and that it was not in her child's best interest to terminate her parental rights, termination decision was proper.
|
|||||
| In re Martin K., (AC 18917),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, November 30, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's findings were not clearly erroneous in terminating parental rights of respondent mother.
|
|||||
| Mucherino v. Bj's Wholesale Club, CV 960333312S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, November 30, 1999, Decided , November 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's action against defendant condominium association was barred by statute of limitations; plaintiff's service upon the store where he was injured did not constitute proper service upon defendant.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
