 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Caleb Village Heights Found. v. Barclay, 063265,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 8, 2001, Decided , January 8, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claims that tenants suffered damages because landlord allowed sewage problem to persist, thereby enhancing his economic condition by not making expenditures public policy demanded, satisfied cigarette rule and exposed him to CUTPA liability.
|
|||||
| Calore v. Town of Stratford, CV980357147S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 8, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: School officials sued for negligence by parents of injured student could not seek apportionment from parents of assailants, because they failed to make required showing that assault was negligent rather than intentional.
|
|||||
| Carameta v. Allstate Ins. Co., CV00069943,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 8, 2001, Decided , January 8, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where insured's contract claim and tort claims against insurer all arose from same car accident and underinsured motorist claim to insurer, claims were properly joined in one complaint.
|
|||||
| Cornerstone Bank v. Oak St. Ctr., CV990169832,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 8, 2001, Decided , January 8, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion to strike defendant property owner's counterclaim was granted where the counterclaim failed to state a cause of action recognizable in Connecticut.
|
|||||
| Doyle v. Webster, CV990079961, CV980076407, CV970074982,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 8, 2001, Decided , January 8, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment entered for defendants in plaintiff landowners' suit for leachate contamination of their soil and water, as court found defendants' expert witness more credible than plaintiffs' expert.
|
|||||
| Fletcher v. Mead Sch. for Human Dev., XO5CV960152138S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 8, 2001, Decided , January 8, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where civil jury claim was not properly filed, yet more than three years passed between initial jury claim and defendant' motion to erase, court exercised its discretion and placed case on jury docket.
|
|||||
| Grehl v. Crossroads Condo. Ass'n, CV000338232S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 8, 2001, Decided , January 8, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to strike defendant's apportionment complaint against maintenance company was denied where the maintenance company may have been responsible for a proportionate share of plaintiff's damages.
|
|||||
| Harris v. New Milford Zoning Comm'n, CV000081830S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 8, 2001, Decided , January 8, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While the owner of real estate which bordered property affected by a decision of a town's zoning commission had standing to challenge an amendment to regulations, the commission had broad discretion to affect changes in the regulations.
|
|||||
| Hassantalebi v. Alnouri, FA000178612,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 8, 2001, Decided , January 8, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Marriage of wife and husband was dissolved. Where husband failed to appear and was no longer in country, direct transfer of wife's residence to wife's name only was warranted. Wife would have sole custody of minor children.
|
|||||
| Hill v. Hill, FA910374254S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 8, 2001, Decided , January 8, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court ordered an escrow for taxes from the sale of the marital home to be terminated and distributed to pay priority attorney's lien, certain bills, and for the balance to be paid to the parties. There was not proof tax payment would occur.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
