 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alexson v. Foss, SC 17365,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 10, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly confirmed an arbitration award, nothwithstanding compliance with Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47-28, as such was a recording and not a jurisdictional statute, an adverse possession ruling in the contestant's favor did not manifestly disregard the law, and the award conformed to the parties's submission and without any partiality or bias.
|
|||||
| Arnold v. LaPlante, CV055001140,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 10, 2006, Decided , January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's medical malpractice action against hospital doctors and others was dismissed, because the inmate failed to file a notice of the claim against the officials in their state as required by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-141 et seq., and therefore defendants were covered by sovereign immunity.
|
|||||
| Barnard v. Barnard, FA054002899S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 10, 2006, Decided , January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Based on the parties' present circumstances, a husband was ordered to pay to a wife the weekly alimony of $ 50 per week. When $ 154 of previously agreed child support was factored in, the wife had $ 1,011 of disposable income, while the husband had $ 619.
|
|||||
| Bove v. Bove, (AC 26056),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 10, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a partition action, as a co-owner was clearly avoiding service, the court properly found that in-hand service was best. Further, given the history of the case, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the co-owner's continuance motions, and said motions did not implicate his due process rights.
|
|||||
| Comdata Network, Inc. v. Northeast Distrib., Inc., CV044002290S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ertel v. Demmon, AC 26104,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 10, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. City of New London, 4003165,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 10, 2006, Decided , January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court granted the motion to dismiss filed by multiple defendants; claimant alleging that their implementation of a municipal development plan had caused unreasonable pollution failed to allege a colorable claim that their conduct had done so, and, thus, the claimant failed to gain standing under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 22a-16.
|
|||||
| Gaudreau v. City of Norwich Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 4102381,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where Connecticut property owner had received neither actual nor constructive notice of increased valuation of property until it was too late to seek administrative review, due process principles demanded that she be allowed to seek review by a court without regard to exhaustion of remedies principles.
|
|||||
| In re Diamonds M., K09CT05009754A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, JUVENILE MATTERS, AT WATERFORD, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the father of a teenage child was incarcerated on drug-related charges and estranged from his daughter, the court made a finding of abandonment by clear and convincing evidence. A consideration of the factors under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 45a-717(h), showed that the termination of his parental rights was in the best interests of the child.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
