 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Murphy v. Eddinger, CV 980086973,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, November 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The plaintiff had no viable cause of action in negligence suit against the defendants' landowners because defendants did not owe a common law affirmative duty to the plaintiff.
|
|||||
| Prinvest Corp. v. American Ins. Co., CV 990362427S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, November 30, 1999, Decided , November 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiff alleged and provided evidence that it was an assignee of assignor, which was a claimant under the terms of the surety bond, plaintiff assumed assignor's place as a claimant, and had standing to bring a claim.
|
|||||
| Rinaldi v. Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Co., CV 970339377S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, November 30, 1999, Decided , November 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an insurance agreement did not include an agreement regarding uninsured motorist coverage, genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether an agreement existed altering the prioritization of plaintiff's coverage.
|
|||||
| Rocque v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, CV 980492734S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, November 30, 1999, Decided , November 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sexually explicit details in complainant's personnel files were exempt from disclosure in sexual harassment investigation, as information was highly offensive to ordinary reasonable man and of no legitimate public interest.
|
|||||
| Skw Real Estate P'ship v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales, (AC 17397),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, November 30, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiff's counsel's statement in previous foreclosure action that premises were vacant did not affect previous decision, application of judicial estoppel in breach of lease agreement action was inappropriate.
|
|||||
| Smith v. Allstate Indem. Co., CV 980354137S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, November 30, 1999, Decided , November 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant insurance carrier's rule to not settle minimum uninsured motorist claims violated public policy making plaintiff insured's unfair trade practice claim viable despite nonviability of unfair insurance practice claim.
|
|||||
| Stanley v. Commissioner of Correction, CV 940538267,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, November 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied, but right to sentence review was restored; petitioner failed to prove counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness or that result could have differed.
|
|||||
| State v. Avery, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, November 30, 1999, Decided , November 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Search and seizure warrant used to seize defendant's weapons lacked legal sufficiency; warrant did not contain a factual representation sufficient for the court to support a finding that "no reasonable alternative" was available.
|
|||||
| State v. Brown, (AC 17606),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, November 30, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment of conviction affirmed; Record indicated that trial court was neutral throughout its questioning of witness, and its actions had no prejudicial effect against the defendant.
|
|||||
| State v. Coleman, (SC 15947),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, November 30, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Instruction "law is made to protect society and innocent persons, and not to protect guilty ones" did not violate defendant's constitutional rights to have jury instructed on presumption of innocence and reasonable doubt.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
