 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Essex Sav. Bank v. Shickel, CV 990088334 S, CV 920064918,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 10, 2000, Decided , January 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment granted to bank on issue of defendant's liability for a deficiency judgment, obtained as a result of a prior foreclosure action. Defendant did not present any evidence to rebut that the debt remained unpaid.
|
|||||
| FDIC v. Cantore, CV 980164815,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 10, 2000, Decided , January 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In action by bank's receiver for default and foreclosure on note, plaintiff's motion to strike special defenses of res judicata and laches was granted because there was no final judgment and no demonstrated prejudice.
|
|||||
| Faria v. Faria, CV 9915600,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 10, 2000, Decided , January 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over summary process action because no lease existed between parties at time landlord served notice for lapse of time on tenant at sufferance, and thus notice was legally ineffective.
|
|||||
| Genser v. Thomas, CV 980492635,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Medicaid eligibility denied; assets exceeded allowable limits and normal aging process symptoms were not "exceptional circumstances" that justified increasing community spouse's minimum monthly maintenance needs allowance.
|
|||||
| McConnell v. McConnell, FA 990722859,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, January 10, 2000, Decided , January 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where court lacked jurisdiction to enter orders other than the dissolution decree in plaintiff wife's divorce, child custody, and support action, defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction was granted.
|
|||||
| Stafford v. Stafford, D.N.: FA 990171917S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 10, 2000, Decided , January 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court had the authority to order payment of alimony and support, pendente lite, even when the required amount and award exceeded the amount of defendant's available income.
|
|||||
| State v. Marion, CR 1199106081, CR 11-99-106081,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 10, 2000, Decided , January 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prosecuting attorney who was likely to be called as witness was disqualified due to her involvement in investigation and prosecuting attorney's office was disqualified because it failed to build "Chinese Wall" around her.
|
|||||
| State v. White, CR 1199106088,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 10, 2000, Decided , January 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to disqualify State's Attorney's Office from continuing larceny prosecution was granted where Assistant State's Attorney violated rules of professional conduct and was not insulated from the investigation.
|
|||||
| Wprx, Inc. v. Gradante, CV 970482490S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 10, 2000, Decided , January 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered for landlord in tenant's claim that landlord was unjustly enriched by tenant's improvements to property. In counterclaim for slander of title and interference with contract, plaintiff prevailed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
