 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Partridge v. Partridge, FA990365655S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 8, 2002, Decided , January 8, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Unless parties waived their rights or consented to late judgment, delay in entering judgment beyond 120-day period required new trial. It was party who needed to agree to waive deadline, and his attorney had no implied authority to do so.
|
|||||
| Plemmons v. Newton, FA000557263,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, FAMILY SUPPORT MAGISTRATE, January 8, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The alleged father had an IQ of 67 and was willing to sign anything. Thus, the court found cause to set aside the paternity acknowledgment and allow genetic testing as the paternity statute was unconstitutional.
|
|||||
| Serra v. City of W. Haven, CV010447771S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 8, 2002, Decided , January 8, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fact that vehicle was used as emergency vehicle did not exempt it from statute requiring minimum UIM coverage. City, as self-insurer, was not required to give notice in writing to limit its UIM coverage.
|
|||||
| Slack v. Slack, FA010095065,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 8, 2002, Decided , January 8, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court dissolved marriage and entered orders regarding division of marital property and marital debt.
|
|||||
| State v. Henderson, (SC 16463),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 8, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of writ of error coram nobis was affirmed where, not only did defendant have adequate remedies provided by law available to him, namely, habeas corpus actions, but defendant was actually pursuing such remedies.
|
|||||
| State v. Miller, (AC 21471),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 8, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut defendant did not preserve claim that questioning on one crime was pretext for eliciting confession regarding another crime; self-defense instruction properly covered objective and subjective elements.
|
|||||
| State v. Olson, (AC 21616),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 8, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute allowed accused who entered conditional nolo contendere plea to appeal only from actions described therein. Claim of insufficient evidence was not claim permitted to be appealed, and trial court mistakenly accepted conditional plea.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
