 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Quasius v. Quasius, FA010380415S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 9, 2003, Decided , January 9, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dissolution of marriage action, the husband was primarily responsible for the breakdown of the marriage, which, together with the fact that he was nine years younger than the wife, made appropriate a diminished distribution to the husband.
|
|||||
| Syms v. Warden, CV000595998S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 9, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A habeas corpus petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel was denied; even if counsel had been ineffective, petitioner failed to show that the outcome of the proceedings would have been different but for such ineffectiveness.
|
|||||
| Van Buren v. Van Buren, FA000340763S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, REGIONAL FAMILY TRIAL DOCKET AT DANBURY, January 9, 2003, Decided , January 9, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Husband's report of income, expenses, and value of family home was not credible. Wife was awarded child support, and alimony. Regional Family Trial Docket retained jurisdiction as to contributions toward children's higher education expenses.
|
|||||
| Woollacott v. Woollacott, FA970064477S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 9, 2003, Decided , January 9, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where father was disabled, and child received a Social Security disability dependency check, the father was permitted, as agreed by the parties, to receive a credit against his child support and daycare arrearages in the amount of benefits received.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
