 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sizer v. Conn. Post, CV020398342,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 9, 2004, Decided , January 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to strike IIED and NIED claims was granted as employee failed to allege facts to show conduct was so outrageous and extreme as to go beyond bounds of decency or employer should have realized conduct involved risk of causing emotional distress.
|
|||||
| United Techs. Corp. v. Saren Eng'G, X06CV020173135S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 9, 2004, Decided , January 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was denied in a case involving an industrial ammonia delivery system where fact questions existed as to which party was responsible for use of a faulty valve in the system and whether the valve was suitable for its intended purpose.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
