 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Provost, (SC 16012),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, November 30, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly limited a defendant's cross-examination of a prosecution witness where there was no material basis for the subject area of inquiry, and there was no prosecutorial misconduct in its closing argument.
|
|||||
| State v. Stern, MV 229821449,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, November 30, 1999, Decided , November 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant consented to release of her hospital records to police after car crash so her motion to suppress evidence of her blood alcohol level was denied even though the procedures did not conform to statutory requirements.
|
|||||
| State v. Watson, (SC 15924),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, November 30, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Jury was adequately instructed that defendant was entitled to presumption of innocence, and alibi witness's cross-examination testimony regarding failure to alert police about alibi did not cast doubt upon trial's fairness.
|
|||||
| Stewart v. Gothie, 549831,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, November 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs were entitled to seek injunctive relief without first exhausting administrative remedies where they adequately alleged specific and material claims of damage caused by defendants' violations of zoning regulations.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
