 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Kalman, AC 24788,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 10, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a Maadi MISR firearm was comparable to an AK-47 assault weapon prohibited by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53-202a (1999) and defendant had fair warning that his possession of the same was unlawful, his conviction under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53-202c was upheld and did not violate his rights to due process.
|
|||||
| State v. Theoferlius D., (AC 25530),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 10, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 36-17, the State may file a substitute information before trial. Defendant had notice that his probation violation charge was based in part on his failure to register as a sex offender because the State filed a substitute information alleging this nearly two months before the trial.
|
|||||
| Sunwood Dev. Corp. v. Inland Wetlands Comm'n of Hamden, NNHCV040484688,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 10, 2006, Decided , January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the court found, inter alia, that there was no support for a finding that mining in the wetlands would result in poor water quality, an adverse impact on the wetlands, or contaminated ground water, it reversed the denial of the developer's petition to conduct mining pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 22a-42a(c)(1).
|
|||||
| Vollemans v. Town of Wallingford, CV040286311,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 10, 2006, Decided , January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City's summary judgment motion was granted as to a former employee's age discrimination action as the employee failed to file a notice of appeal with an anti-discrimination agency within the 180-day time frame provided by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-82, and thus the action was barred by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-100.
|
|||||
| Webley v. Dillon, FA044002733,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
