|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 9, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
Tata v. Frederick, CV040183691S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 9, 2007, Decided , January 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motorcycle owner remained party to personal injury action even after grant of summary judgment on one count of the complaint; ownership allegation in another count one of the complaint raised the Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-183 presumption that driver of the cycle was the owner's agent; as owner never rebutted the presumption, he remained a party.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Whyth v. Biller Associates-Tri State, LLC, CV055000181S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 9, 2007, Decided , January 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Conn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.9 did not require counsel's disqualification for having represented the company his client sued because the company cited no facts showing a substantial relation between the past representation and the current case. The fact that the opponent was in the same type of business as when counsel represented it was insufficient.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|