 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Tata v. Frederick, CV040183691S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 9, 2007, Decided , January 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motorcycle owner remained party to personal injury action even after grant of summary judgment on one count of the complaint; ownership allegation in another count one of the complaint raised the Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-183 presumption that driver of the cycle was the owner's agent; as owner never rebutted the presumption, he remained a party.
|
|||||
| Tortora v. Olson, CV044005207S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff, who had cohabited with defendant, was entitled to half of the profits realized from the sale of a condominium that had been purchased in both parties' names. Plaintiff had stated a claim for unjust enrichment; the court credited his testimony that he had quitclaimed his interest based on a misrepresentation by defendant.
|
|||||
| Whyth v. Biller Associates-Tri State, LLC, CV055000181S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 9, 2007, Decided , January 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.9 did not require counsel's disqualification for having represented the company his client sued because the company cited no facts showing a substantial relation between the past representation and the current case. The fact that the opponent was in the same type of business as when counsel represented it was insufficient.
|
|||||
| Winn v. Posades, (SC 17567),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 9, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Wrongful death action was properly dismissed despite evidence officer was traveling 58 to 75 miles per hour in 25 mile per hour zone and was looking in opposite direction from that which decedent was coming, because there was no evidence as to how accident actually happened; thus, administratrix failed to show officer's conduct was proximate cause.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
