 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Beizer v. DOL, (AC 18242), (AC 18898),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: According to statute, district court only had jurisdiction to review decisions by agency and did not have the power to decide counterclaim where it was acting as appellate court, and not as a court of general jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Bouchard v. Bouchard, FA 980148381,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Marriage dissolved on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown; property division ordered; plaintiff ordered to pay defendant alimony; defendant to pay counsel fees for plaintiff's attorney.
|
|||||
| Connelly v. Warden, CV 970567686,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, January 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondent was ordered to calculate petitioner's sentence credits, since all confinement prior to the vacation of the original sentence should have been characterized as presentence confinement and credited as such.
|
|||||
| Dailey v. Department of Children & Families, CV 980492670S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 11, 2000, Decided , January 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A former foster family's application for license renewal was denied because of their threatening, inappropriate and manipulative behavior and failure to cooperate with a treatment plan regarding a former foster child.
|
|||||
| Fernandez v. Estate of Ayers, (AC 19093),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Proof that defendants owned property or had insurance policy covering property was not sufficient to establish control of property where the property had been leased to and was in possession of tenant at time of accident.
|
|||||
| Fiorita v. Fiorita, FA 920126887S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 11, 2000, Decided , January 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court had jurisdiction and could modify child support portion of unallocated award of alimony and child support despite provision in separation agreement prohibiting modification of alimony.
|
|||||
| Forbotnick v. Kalinowski, CVH 5967, H-1186,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, HOUSING SESSION, January 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In action by disabled tenant against landlord, tenant was awarded damages for unlawful entry and detainer, conversion, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and attorney fees. Defendant received damages for back rent.
|
|||||
| General Plasma v. Reliance Ins. Co., CV 970575899S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, January 11, 2000, Decided , January 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer's breach of policy's duty to defend entitled plaintiff to costs incurred in defending and settling separate negligence action, as well as reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in bringing the instant action.
|
|||||
| Haussherr-Hughes v. Redenz, CV 980332716S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 11, 2000, Decided , January 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Zoning enforcement officer's demand for injunctive relief to enforce cease and desist order prohibiting residents from parking two commercial trucks was denied zoning board of appeals was proper venue for determining issue.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
