LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Connecticut - January 9, 2002

  
Almonte v. Krajeski, CV980332796S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 9, 2002, Decided , January 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: There was no error in refusal to give instruction regarding intersection with no traffic signal, where intersection in instant action had traffic lights, as instruction would have been factually incorrect and could have caused juror confusion.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Anely v. Allstate Ins. Co., CV980166413S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 9, 2002, Decided , January 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The court held after applying the required factors to determine choice of law issues, that Connecticut had the most significant interest in the injured party's claim against the insurer for uninsured benefits.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Benitez v. Warden, CV010453138S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Inmate was denied habeas corpus relief based on inadequate medical treatment claim where evidence showed warden provided treatment for as long as inmate complained about injury, and thus inmate could not prove deliberate indifference by warden.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman v. Helmsman Mgmt. Servs., 443753, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 9, 2002, Decided , January 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Motion to strike was denied where trade act count incorporated allegations that agent engaged in misleading conduct in filing workers' compensation form and unfair insurance claim was predicated on claims of misrepresentation and false information.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Genetti v. Genetti, FA000371583S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Husband was found in contempt after he allowed his brother to keep part of purchase price of certain real property in violation of order in divorce decree that required husband to give wife half of the net proceeds from sale of the property.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Guarnieri v. Moutinho, CV010384663S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 9, 2002, Decided , January 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Sellers proved that a contract existed for the sale of real property and that the buyer breached the contract by not closing or obtaining financing for the transaction.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hopkins v. Obermeyer, X07CV990076715S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT TOLLAND, January 9, 2002, Decided , January 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Based on legislative history, statute that required skiers to assume risk of injury despite other skiers' negligence barred skiing teacher's negligence suit against another skier and was not restricted to actions against ski area operators.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Tosj B., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, JUVENILE MATTERS AT NEW HAVEN, January 9, 2002, Decided , January 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Parental rights were terminated after mother failed to complete steps necessary to prepare for child's return, there was no ongoing parent-child relationship, and mother had shown no interest, concern, or responsibility as to child's welfare.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Linders v. Crystal Lake Bar & Grill, CV0075526, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 9, 2002, Decided , January 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Damages were awarded to injured party in her suit against bar and permittee. Injuries occurred when driver of car, in which injured party was passenger, crashed. Bar was liable for serving driver alcohol when she was intoxicated.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Miller v. Michaelson, FA980167683S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 9, 2002, Decided , January 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A wife's motion for reconsideration of a divorce decision was granted, and an immediate income withholding order was entered to secure the court's financial orders. The wife's motions for contempt were denied.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.