 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Paulay W., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, January 11, 2000, Decided , January 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The petition to terminate parental rights was granted, because the child was abandoned by the parents, the parents had not achieved a reasonable degree of rehabilitation, and termination of parental rights was in the best interest of the child.
|
|||||
| Powers v. Olson, (SC 16043),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A map referred to in the deed did not give plaintiff constructive notice of defendant's right to slope plaintiff's property because the deed only referred to the map's first page, which did not show a reservation of slope rights.
|
|||||
| Quindazzi v. Quindazzi, (AC 18191),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: New trial was required even though plaintiff was willing to withdraw claim for life insurance where plaintiff could not act on behalf of children and life insurance issue may have been interwoven with other financial issues.
|
|||||
| Riggione v. Kmart Corp., CV 990425255S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 11, 2000, Decided , January 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owner was responsible for any negligence of independent contractor in failing to maintain property in safe condition; thus, there were no damages to apportion between them when injury occurred on the property.
|
|||||
| Summerbrook v. Foston, (AC 18326),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Requirement that appellate court be provided with adequate record was not met where plaintiff only provided transcript of proceedings and did not move for the trial court to articulate its factual and legal conclusions.
|
|||||
| Szczapa v. UPS, (AC 18541),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since plaintiff's injuries were caused by fellow worker's negligence arising during the course of plaintiff's employment, plaintiff's sole remedy against his employer, defendant, was the receipt of workers' compensation benefits.
|
|||||
| Third Taxing Dist. of Norwalk v. Tenore, CV 990173754S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 11, 2000, Decided , January 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The individual's motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration was properly granted where the agreement was still before the court and allegedly governed the employment relationship between the individual and the Third Taxing District.
|
|||||
| Thompson v. Zoning Comm'n of Stratford, CV 990494184,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 11, 2000, Decided , January 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Zoning commission's denial of affordable housing application reversed; insufficient evidence supported the denial and there was no public interest in requiring strict compliance with its own affordable housing regulations.
|
|||||
| Woodhall Sch. v. Town of Bethlehem, CV 970074492S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of educational purpose tax exemption for school's real property, the headmaster's residence, reversed and refund ordered with interest, costs and attorney fees. Property was used only in furthering educational mission.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
