 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Coady v. Martin, CV 970572742S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, January 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment granted for defendants on the cross-complaints to the extent of granting a permanent injunction against plaintiffs prohibiting them from using trade name; there was no meeting of the minds.
|
|||||
| Danielczuk v. Ansonia Bd. of Apportionment & Taxation, CV 98062818,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although tax board could reduce budget estimates, it could not refuse to fund plaintiff's estimated salary budget submission because the effect of such an action would have negated plaintiff's exclusive legislative powers.
|
|||||
| Ervolino v. Ervolino, FA 980331662S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 12, 2000, Decided , January 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The marriage between the parties was dissolved and each party was held equally at fault for the breakdown; the court issued orders for alimony, child custody, visitation, child support, and property division.
|
|||||
| Franco v. Franco, FA 990427901S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court ordered legal separation, made property division, and ordered husband to pay alimony to wife, based on parties' ages, inability to work, and income from pension plans, social security, and disability benefits.
|
|||||
| Grynkiewicz v. Freight Liner of Hartford, CV 990497586S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 12, 2000, Decided , January 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to strike count of complaint alleging employer's conduct in terminating employee compelled plaintiff to defame himself was granted since alleged false statement was not communicated to someone other than plaintiff.
|
|||||
| Mojica v. Benjamin, CV 950323700S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In injury action by plaintiff passenger, verdict for both drivers was not set aside because evidence was sufficient to find that both were driving with care and there was no error in refusing plaintiff's requested charges.
|
|||||
| Myers v. Warden, CV 0564812,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, January 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied because petitioner did not show that his trial attorney's casual knowledge of victim's mother and stepfather created actual conflict of interest or affected attorney's performance.
|
|||||
| Pillar v. Pillar, 0549239,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Divorce was granted and appropriate orders were entered upon due consideration of applicable statutory and case law, and after giving consideration to testimony, exhibits, statements of counsel, and parties' stipulations.
|
|||||
| Reale v. Reale, FA 9970340S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 12, 2000, Decided , January 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to dismiss was denied regarding divorce action, because wife retained legal capacity to maintain action; court deferred action of motion to strike in order to allow wife to add her conservators to action.
|
|||||
| Rudolph Netsch Constr. Co. v. State, CV 980583698S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, January 12, 2000, Decided , January 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant State Department of Public Works did not exhibit favoritism and where defendant bidding company was qualified to perform project, plaintiff lowest bidder was denied injunction preventing work on project.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
