 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Benton v. Simpson, CV010385675S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 10, 2002, Decided , January 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court found that four employees met their burden with respect to prejudgment remedy even though some could question whether supervisor's conduct would establish claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
|
|||||
| Betensky v. Opcon Assocs., CV990421034S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 10, 2002, Decided , January 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reformation could be granted only where claim was supported by clear, substantial, and convincing evidence. Even if there had been mistake, there was no evidence of inequitable conduct on the part of other party to the contract.
|
|||||
| Dennis Maloney v. Montague, CV000445159S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 10, 2002, Decided , January 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Whether truck driver's actions in causing 1st accident created foreseeable risk and were proximate cause of decedent's death in 2nd accident were issues of reasonable disagreement to be decided by trier of fact; summary judgment was denied.
|
|||||
| Equicredit v. Brown, CV010182993S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 10, 2002, Decided , January 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A corporation was entitled to strict foreclosure on, because the corporation made a prima facie showing that it was the owner of the note and mortgage in question, and that the property owner had defaulted on the note and mortgage.
|
|||||
| Hanton v. Warden, CV980414855,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Habeas corpus petition was dismissed where court could not find that performance of trial counsel was deficient in any way. Inmate had confessed on two occasions to crime of which he was convicted and no grounds existed to suppress confession.
|
|||||
| Hildonen v. Kaspar, CV010066107S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 10, 2002, Decided , January 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff in breach of contract action failed to show necessity for temporary injunction to enjoin transfers of defendant's property. Evidence also failed to show probable cause to grant $ 400,000 attachment against defendant's real estate.
|
|||||
| Hill v. Hill, FA990171402S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 10, 2002, Decided , January 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The marriage was dissolved due to an irretrievable breakdown. The husband was ordered to pay, among other things, periodic alimony, child support, and to contribute to the children's private school education. Property was equitably divided.
|
|||||
| Hill v. Williams, CV990171167S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 10, 2002, Decided , January 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Client's malpractice action against deceased attorney's estate was dismissed where all claims were time barred. Although great latitude was given to pro se litigant, court would not entirely disregard rules of practice.
|
|||||
| In re Zakeya B., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, JUVENILE MATTERS AT MIDDLETOWN, January 10, 2002, Decided , January 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parental rights of mother and father were terminated where mother consented to termination and father, whose location was unknown, left when mother was pregnant, did not know his children, and did not appear in the proceedings.
|
|||||
| Integrated Corporate Rels. v. Tag-It Pac., CV010382762S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 10, 2002, Decided , January 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court had jurisdiction over the instant action; although the agreement was made in Nevada, the contract was performed in Connecticut, and the client should reasonably have anticipated being hailed into court in Connecticut.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
