|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 22, 2002
|
| |
Breadventures, Inc. v. Mrvic, CV000180681,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 22, 2002, Decided , February 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where co-owner sought protective order to prevent his wife's deposition from being taken in civil suit against him by corporation and owner, wife, as witness spouse, had right to assert privilege against giving adverse spousal testimony.
|
|
| |
Briley v. Warden, 551867,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 22, 2002, Decided , February 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Carpenter v. Law Offices of Dressler, CV010804795S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 22, 2002, Decided , February 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Cause of action that would have allowed predecessor attorney to make apportionment claim against successor attorneys in legal malpractice claim was barred as against public policy. Apportionment complaint was stricken.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cranwell v. Cranwell, FA990723181,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 22, 2002, Decided , February 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In marriage dissolution action, trial court dissolved marriage on grounds of irretrievable breakdown, awarded wife $ 400 per week in periodic alimony, and incorporated parties' parenting plan and stipulated division of assets into judgment.
|
|
| |
Orchard Place Assocs. v. Briggs, CV010182302,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 22, 2002, Decided , February 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Servient owners did not meet their burden in attempting to show that the dominant owner's express right of way to the easement had been extinguished or modified. The uninterrupted element was missing, as the vehicle was not a permanent fixture.
|
|
| |
Pearlman v. Newtown Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV010342957S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 22, 2002, Decided , February 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Record supported zoning commission's determination that property owner's proposal to divide 4.293-acre parcel of land into two lots, one with 500-foot frontage and the other with 54-foot frontage, did not meet requirements of zoning regulations.
|
|
| |
Shahabudin v. Montford, FA010451723S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 22, 2002, Decided , February 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because wife violated automatic orders by making withdrawals from her checking account, husband was to receive half of amount withdrawn. Husband was to retain his total pension and half of wife's retirement accounts.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback