 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Assured Techs. v. Cyberian Outpost, CV020088904S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 13, 2003, Decided , January 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Seeking a prejudgment remedy had nothing to do with resolving a dispute between the parties, but simply protected assets to effectuate the arbitration award. Arbitration clause in agreement did not bar plaintiff from seeking a prejudgment remedy.
|
|||||
| Buttacavoli v. Buttacavoli, FA020124809S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 13, 2003, Decided , January 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court found that the husband was more at fault for the breakdown of the parties' marriage, dissolved the marriage, granted joint custody of the children, ordered the husband to pay alimony and child support, and divided the property.
|
|||||
| Haley v. Johnson, FA000377734S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 13, 2003, Decided , January 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A former client's motion to compel an attorney to turn over the former client's file was denied; the facts relating to the discharge of the attorney and the question of the former client's need for the file were unresolved questions of fact.
|
|||||
| Haynes v. Rajala, CV010804706S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 13, 2003, Decided , January 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Relocation lien placed on a landlord's property was released because due process requirements were not followed in the filing of the lien because the landlord was not provided with notice of the lien before the filing of the lien.
|
|||||
| Leviness v. Klebe Fuel Co., CV020087327S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 13, 2003, Decided , January 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Strict liability and breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing claims had to be stricken as they did not set forth enough facts to show that soldering involved high degree of risk of harm to others or that corporation acted in bad faith.
|
|||||
| Llp Mortg. v. Gurski, CV020087002S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Borrower's special defenses, including lack of counsel and consideration claims, to a mortgage assignee's strict foreclosure action were struck on the ground that they were all legally insufficient as invalid defenses to a strict foreclosure action.
|
|||||
| Lord v. Smith, 543668,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 13, 2003, Decided , January 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father, who separated from the mother of his child, had no right to disobey a court order permitting the mother to get personal property from the father's house. For being in contempt he was ordered to pay the mother the value of the property.
|
|||||
| Madden v. City of New London, CV000554971S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 13, 2003, Decided , January 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a non-conforming, pre-existing use of a property provided an intense use, its highest and best use was as a residential income-producing property; the income approach to value was used to determine the fair market value.
|
|||||
| Savin Gasoline Props. v. Lisbon Planning & Zoning Comm'n, 124145,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A Connecticut zoning commission properly exercised its discretion in approving an application for a special use permit where substantial evidence supported its determination that a sewage disposal plan met local standards.
|
|||||
| Smigala v. Town of Brookfield, CV020344887S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 13, 2003, Decided , January 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A town's motion to strike an injured party's nuisance action, which sought to recover for injuries sustained when the injured party tripped and fell over a catch basin in a road, was granted; a defective highway statute was the exclusive remedy.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
